Hero_Shema
10-08-2002, 01:14 AM
Thank you all for replying. I followed bwkaz advice and tried out what he told me. Every thing works the way it should be. Only one thing doesn't match:
when i ran xdpyinfo and looked through the extension list for GLX, NV-GLX, and NV-CONTROL, NV-GLX was repeated twice! I'm not sure what does this mean! glxgears was getting over 10,000 FPS, which I guess is above decent!. I've noticed something, however, while running glxgears which leads me to a new question: when glxgears was working, the CPU was getting crazy load. Even though with my card, most of the 3D rendering should be handled, supposidly, by the nvidia card's CPU, as nvidia claims!!! Any explanations?
"It is an old observation that the best writers sometimes disregard the rules of rhetoric. When they do so, however, the reader will usually find in the sentence some compensating merit, attained at the cost of the violation. Unless he is certain of doing as well, he will probably do best to follow the rules." William Strunk and E.B. White
when i ran xdpyinfo and looked through the extension list for GLX, NV-GLX, and NV-CONTROL, NV-GLX was repeated twice! I'm not sure what does this mean! glxgears was getting over 10,000 FPS, which I guess is above decent!. I've noticed something, however, while running glxgears which leads me to a new question: when glxgears was working, the CPU was getting crazy load. Even though with my card, most of the 3D rendering should be handled, supposidly, by the nvidia card's CPU, as nvidia claims!!! Any explanations?
"It is an old observation that the best writers sometimes disregard the rules of rhetoric. When they do so, however, the reader will usually find in the sentence some compensating merit, attained at the cost of the violation. Unless he is certain of doing as well, he will probably do best to follow the rules." William Strunk and E.B. White