brasso
04-16-2001, 10:21 PM
I got interested in the "/ is full" thread and the discussion of construction of another partition to put /usr on. So, using PartitionMagic4 in Win98, I tried making an extra partition for myself.
My RH7 was installed on my hdb, with a /boot, /, and /swap partitions, ALL THREE were primary partitions. The rest of the 20G disk was an extended DOS FAT32 partition that I put my backup images on with DriveImage2.
I freed up space and tried making another primary partition, no go, I can only have 4 partitons. So I tried making freespace, then making a Linux logical partition INSIDE that DOS extended partition. Seemed to go OK.
Then I booted into RH7 and did a
fdisk /dev/hdb
a 'p' shows my new partition and calls it a Linux type. All seems hunky-dory?
I thought that the Linux partitions HAD TO all be put on a primary. I certainly didn't expect I could stick them inside a DOS extended partition. Could Linux exist on all logical partitions (except the /boot)? Could someone tell me the rules of constructing Linux partitions?
Earl
My RH7 was installed on my hdb, with a /boot, /, and /swap partitions, ALL THREE were primary partitions. The rest of the 20G disk was an extended DOS FAT32 partition that I put my backup images on with DriveImage2.
I freed up space and tried making another primary partition, no go, I can only have 4 partitons. So I tried making freespace, then making a Linux logical partition INSIDE that DOS extended partition. Seemed to go OK.
Then I booted into RH7 and did a
fdisk /dev/hdb
a 'p' shows my new partition and calls it a Linux type. All seems hunky-dory?
I thought that the Linux partitions HAD TO all be put on a primary. I certainly didn't expect I could stick them inside a DOS extended partition. Could Linux exist on all logical partitions (except the /boot)? Could someone tell me the rules of constructing Linux partitions?
Earl