Click to See Complete Forum and Search --> : Why Drake 8.1 is slow...


irlandes
11-05-2001, 12:56 AM
First try to use Drake 8.1:

I was building up a 200 MHZ machine, 32 MB RAM, of unknown ancestry, bought at Midwest Computer Brokers when I visited Cedar Rapids. I am giving it to my nearly poverty stricken son. He has been using my old 486 for Internet, which works fine unless you need Java or something.

I installed 8.1 dualboot with Win 98. It was SLOW! I mean like two or three minutes to open and close a window.

Next, I discovered Supermount was busted. While I know how to manually mount and umount, some of the package install software expected it to work, and went bananas when the CD didn't mount itself.

I went to the Net, and found that a neww initscripts was supposed to fix it. Mandrake announced the new initscripts, but it was on none of the mirrors.

So, I installed 8.0, which worked at about the speed I am used to.

I had given a set of 8.1 to my son-in-law, and he planned on having his industrial arts students install it on their computers. I told him, "DON'T DO IT! USE 8.0" So, I guess we are going to use a bunch of 8.1 CDs as coasters.

* * * *
Second attempt, sort of.

I had 8.0 on my 233 MHZ Compaq Presario 1236 laptop, with 96 MB RAM. I thought, "Hey, I can use packages on the 8.1 CDs to update Koffice, to get the latest goodies."

So, I tried to install the koffice from 8.1. I noted the dependency, a file found in kdelibs.

I tried to install kdelibs, and it gave four more dependencies. It also told me if I put in the dependencies, something I needed for my current kdebase would be missing.

I put in the 4 needed packages, then moved the reverse dependency file in /home, installed kdelibs from 8.1, then moved it back. I don't know if this is a way to solve things you need or not.

I have read libraries is a superior way to build an OS, but I have seen too many catch-22's like this to believe it. I hope libraries make things easier for the people who do the free programming on linux; for the users, they create all sorts of problems.

Anyway, I put in koffice, and it indeed has a lot of new goodies, but it was impossibly slow.

So, I reinstalled the old koffice from 8.0.

Then, I played with KDE. It seemed awfully slow.

I came up with a sort of benchmark. Shut down all other windows, except a terminal window in KDE. Then, using a stopwatch, click on the X to close the terminal window.

With Drake 8.0, and kdelibs from 8.1, it consistently took THIRTEEN SECONDS FOR THAT TERMINAL WINDOW TO CLOSE.

I reinstalled the kdelibs from Drake 8.0. Time to close the terminal window is so short I can't time it. Maybe 0.25 or 0.5 seconds.

That means on my laptop, it takes kdelibs from 8.1, 25 to 50 times longer to perform a simple task of closing a terminal window.

The amazing thing is I haven't read anyone else complain about 8.1 being that slow. Yet, on two machines, it's slow.

Note that the much hated Win 98 works fine on both machines.

I have a love/hate relationship with Mandrake. I liked 6.5; 7.2 was trash; 8.0 is cool; 8.1 is trash. If I could find another distro that doesn't wipe out Win98 stuff, and will let me update koffice with the same kernel, I'd be tempted to change distros.

Malakin
11-05-2001, 05:46 AM
yes there are problems with 8.1, like automount doesn't work

but 8.1 is quite a bit faster then 8.0 for me thanks to kde 2.2.1

not sure why you would be having performance problems with 8.1 compared to 8.0, strange.

If you're happy with 8.0 you might as well stick with it. I upgraded to 8.1 and other then the newer kde there wasn't much improvement and it has more problems then 8.0 had.

I have read libraries is a superior way to build an OS, but I have seen too many catch-22's like this to believe it. I hope libraries make things easier for the people who do the free programming on linux; for the users, they create all sorts of problems.All modern OS's use libraries of some sort, they're dll's in windows.