linuxpyro
01-10-2004, 08:36 PM
Anyone use Linux to do multimedia, like video editing, graphics, audio, etc?
|
Click to See Complete Forum and Search --> : Linux multimedia linuxpyro 01-10-2004, 08:36 PM Anyone use Linux to do multimedia, like video editing, graphics, audio, etc? mengle 01-10-2004, 08:49 PM Sure; most people I think do. You should use the search option to look through the forum for various items because this has been brought up so many times before. Common program for graphics creation/changing/editing include the GIMP, sodipodi, and Karbon. I'm not very familiar with video editing so I can't help you there. As for music, you can play with XMMS, rip with grip + lame, and burn with k3b, for example. There are a host of other programs out there. There should be many of these programs available for any major distribution you use. AndrewLubinus89 01-10-2004, 11:53 PM sure, linux is good for multimedia. I find there are great apps like gimp, xmms, and mplayer that are awesome for multimedia. I have a few windows apps that I use under wine too. bwkaz 01-11-2004, 12:21 AM Yes. (:D) linuxpyro 01-11-2004, 12:27 AM Anyone played with anything bigger? Cinelerra, maybe? On an interesting note, I believe they recently released Massive, the graphics/AI program they used to create those battle scenes in LOTR. It's only a matter of time before it finds its way onto KaZaa... :D windowsfree 03-28-2004, 01:20 AM I'm playing around with cinelerra right now, it looks alot like adobe premiere, but more colorfull and more difficult to use, but on that note premiere is also not free! soda_popstar 03-28-2004, 03:50 AM Rhythmbox: MP3/Ogg player Totem: Video/DVD playing GIMP: Image manipulation Cinelerra: Video editing Inkscape: Vector graphics Audacity: Audio editing I don't actually use many of the editors, but I have them installed on my desktop just in case. ;-) I guess I wouldn't be able to give any comment on how good they are, or how they compare to Windows equivalents. yellowdog 03-28-2004, 05:46 AM mplayer is the thing for viewing any video/audio source it recognizes the format for u Satanic Atheist 03-28-2004, 12:18 PM Going on about MPlayer, to update CoDecs and add new ones, I presume I can simply dump them into the directory (wherever I stuffed all the CoDecs when I compiled the damn thing) and that'll be it, right? I won't need to recompile? As for the issue of MM on Linux, I think it's probably the best platform for it since my experiences with MM and A/V Editing usually requires that you have a multitude of (usually expensive) packages to get anything constructive done. At least with Open-Source software you can get what you want when you want it. Linux's extremely efficient memory and processor-cycle handling would improve image and video manipulation whilst the stability of the platform (particularly the filesystem) would help safeguard against corruption. Lastly, everyone knows that professionals use UNIX or their ilk! James katibabi 03-31-2004, 11:33 AM Blender - 3D graphics rendering http://www.blender.org/ MainActor - Commercial video editing http://www.mainactor.com/ JamminJoeyB 03-31-2004, 02:51 PM katibabi beat me too my suggestion about Blender. Kind of a steap learning curve though. cybertron 03-31-2004, 03:27 PM Going on about MPlayer, to update CoDecs and add new ones, I presume I can simply dump them into the directory (wherever I stuffed all the CoDecs when I compiled the damn thing) and that'll be it, right? I won't need to recompile? My understanding is that support for certain file formats has to be compiled in, so the codecs need to be there at compile time. However, with my QT codecs I don't think I had to recompile and MPlayer found them anyway, so I'm not sure that is true for all of them (maybe not the binary win32 ones?). I guess the best thing I can say is to try it and if MPlayer still doesn't support your file then recompile. justlinux.com
Copyright Internet.com Inc. All Rights Reserved. |