disrael
12-15-2003, 02:19 PM
Okay I've been using Linux for years now, I got an internship at a local company and they use Solaris. I've noticed some irritating things in Solaris that weren't there in Linux. Solaris lacked bash, so I had to d/l it and compile it, also a lot of the software seems to be really out of date. The version of perl for example. I asked my manager why we went with Sun's Solaris and he replied "for support". I am not one to call and wait on hold for hours only to learn I know more than the techy I am talking to. Anyway, there seems to be a lot less sources of knowledge about Solaris on the web compared to Linux. They also won't go with Linux cause upper management got scared at the SCO Unix lawsuits. My manager said we might go with HP's Linux, since they claimed to cover anyone if SCO tried to sue. I don't mean this to sound like a wining post.
Further more, on all of the servers they use KSH and they dont even have bash. Anyone have any good arguments for bash as apposed to ksh? I just find bash an easier way of doing things.
-Doron
Further more, on all of the servers they use KSH and they dont even have bash. Anyone have any good arguments for bash as apposed to ksh? I just find bash an easier way of doing things.
-Doron