RichL025
10-12-2003, 07:05 PM
First of all, thanks to everyone who helped me install RH9 on my system here. I am happy to report these electrons come to you without passing through a microsoft product...
In my brand-spanking new Red Hat 9 OS, I downloaded the REAL player for Unix/Linux. Not having much linux knowledge, I selected what I thought was the closest version to my OS, the download marked as "Linux / Alpha Red Hat v 6.2"
Now I have a downloaded file on my desktop, with a "*.bin" extension, which I know from DOS means an executable binary file....
Double-clicking on the file, though, yields an error message that says "Nautilus has no installed viewer capable of displaying xxxxx.bin"
Farting around, I find no other way to "execute" the file.
Is ".bin" a valid filemane extension for linux? Did I download the wrong version? Another choice that looked good was "linux/sparc Red Hat v 6.2". Is this worth trying?
Or, am I missing something _really_ basic about running programs in linux?
Thanks,
Rich L
In my brand-spanking new Red Hat 9 OS, I downloaded the REAL player for Unix/Linux. Not having much linux knowledge, I selected what I thought was the closest version to my OS, the download marked as "Linux / Alpha Red Hat v 6.2"
Now I have a downloaded file on my desktop, with a "*.bin" extension, which I know from DOS means an executable binary file....
Double-clicking on the file, though, yields an error message that says "Nautilus has no installed viewer capable of displaying xxxxx.bin"
Farting around, I find no other way to "execute" the file.
Is ".bin" a valid filemane extension for linux? Did I download the wrong version? Another choice that looked good was "linux/sparc Red Hat v 6.2". Is this worth trying?
Or, am I missing something _really_ basic about running programs in linux?
Thanks,
Rich L